Thoughts on Blogging: Hits, Traffic, and whatnot
by Kevin
I have been thinking about blog traffic a lot today. Why you ask? Well, because of a link in the Corner and some residual traffic from a Mickey Kaus link in Slate, today has been the busiest day (meaning most hits) in the history of my blogging career (or at least since I have been keeping track). This is already the busiest month ever as well, despite there being a week and a half left in the month. In other words, in terms of traffic things couldn’t be better. But . . .
(There is always a “but” isn’t there? You didn’t expect this to end without a little naval gazing or abstract thinking did you?) What I find interesting, and a little frustrating, is that for the most part these hits did not come from bloggers interacting with what I had posted. They didn’t come from people agreeing or disagreeing strongly with something I said. Instead they came because I happened to make a couple of quick posts on hot topics and got linked in a prominent spot at just the right time. Getting an early and intriguing link in the Corner leads to thousands of hits but the vast majority of those people quickly clicked through without spending more than few seconds. A couple of people left some comments. When I bashed the New York Times and got linked by Glenn and then Mickey Kaus, again thousands of hits and very little feedback or conversation. Mostly just people clicking through to see the end of the link.
Don’t get me wrong, I am not complaining. I am grateful for the links and the hits – it makes life more interesting and gets my blog out there to more people. I just wonder how “sticky” this page is these days. What will be left when the ocean of hits subsides? How many of these visitors will come back later to check in? How many of these people will add me to their blogroll (if they have one)? What do you think? Is it better to build a readership through a commitment to quality over the long haul? Or is it better to just be lucky and topical? These type of questions have been bouncing around in my head today.
What I suspect is that the recent success has revealed my shallowness. At the recent blog bash in Cleveland I found myself talking about hits and traffic. I was embarrassed when I realized that the people I was talking to weren’t really that interested in the topic. I realized that, in contrast, I was absorbed in the issue. I tried to laugh it off but it was too late – I knew and they knew that I cared a lot about how many people visited my blog.
So. What does all this mean? It means I still haven’t found the balance between writing for me and writing for hits. I want the best of both worlds. I want lots of hits and to be respected in the morning. But since I am not a professional writer or a person with a lot of time or discipline, that is not likely to occur. What I am going to try to do is just be me – post about what I care about, what I find interesting, what I think has meaning, and let the hits fall where they may. That doesn’t mean I won’t promote my posts or try to write about interesting stuff in hopes that people read it, it just means I am going to try and keep my hit whoring in check.
Anyway, If you are visiting this humble blog via a link from somewhere else, welcome and please take a look around – heck maybe even leave a comment or two. And thanks for visiting.
What’s the point in a blog if no one reads it?
If it wasn’t meant to be read, wouldn’t people journal and save it to a CD or floppy?
I don’t think it is necessary to get too excited when you get a lot of hits, but to me what is really cool is when you get repeat visitors and through commenting/discussion actually develop a relationship of sort.
Blogs are cool.
I blog to start conversations, but few people will bother.
I’d be a real link slut when I started. I got Instapunditted more than most, but very few people would either come on back or leave comments. Now I don’t bother to send Email to Prof. Reynolds unless it’s to draw attention to other bloggers that I think deserve some attention.
I figure you should write what you want and just be glad that a dozen people (or so) will want to leave comments.
James
We all want to have people read our blogs. If you blog, then you concede to having ego and vanity. Hits and traffic are the coin of the realm.
No one thought/thinks any less of you at the Olsen’s. At worst you were given a little good natured ribbing, given your major links just before the party.
thanks for your honesty…
Long time reader, second time commenter. I do not have a blog but I frequently surf through many blogs. My criteria for moving a blog from a one click wonder to my favorites file (which is where your blog has ended up) is that is must not only say something topical (the part that bring me to it) but it must be well written and thoughtful in its consideration of a variety of issues. It must make me think especially if I don’t agree. Quality is always better than quantity.
I confess, I love links to my page. But I don’t write for comments, because they just mean extra work for me. I have the option, but I find it a hassle.
I write to plant seeds and I know that at least on occasion I’ve had success at that. What I find funny about the whole thing is that the times I write thinking, “Now THIS will get their blood pumping!” I get nothing. But another time I might slap up a quick thought that I don’t see as at all controversial or even especially interesting and it sets of an ideological firestorm.
Hmmm… I’ve always said that I come here for your posts. Generally speaking you touch on topics that I would otherwise ignore.
While I don’t always agree with your opinions I admire the fact that your entries are well written. I appreciate you expressing your opinions without making me feel like they are the only opinion.
Heh heh, and just when do you get around to commenting on other people’s blogs?
I asked the question at the Olsen party on do we write, do we write to be read, do we write for a particular audience, or do we write to write. I managed to get out of actually answering myself, but the responses varied. Craig admitted to being a hit whore, he writes to entertain a reader. I myself have found it cathartic and am always surprised when I realized somebody may have actually read my crap. But ever since Barbara (angels&frogs) told me how to check on hits and stats, I find myself checking at least once a day. I must be moving to the dark side.
As for you, Kevin, I’m glad I met you at the party and with stimulating posts like this, I enjoy reading your blog.
I blog to vent, period. I don’t really care if anyone comments, but it’s nice when they do I guess.
Of course, building websites is my business, so I’m kinda absorbed into the genre as a profession.
Writing is my outlet.