Comments on: Holding your nose and voting

By: jim kukral

jim kukral — Sun, 27 Jul 2003 05:14:27 +0000

check box D: none of the above.

dems are screwed

By: Peter Sean Bradley

Peter Sean Bradley — Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:43:31 +0000

Joe Lieberman because he is the only Dem who may have a clue about national defense. Of course, these responses indicate that Lieberman may be the most dangerous Dem candidate.

By: Bryan

Bryan — Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:04:29 +0000

None of the above. If the current Democrat field was all I had to choose from, I’d exercise my right not to vote.

By: Kathy K

Kathy K — Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:39:47 +0000

Lieberman here, very reluctantly, if I had to vote Democrat.
Though if McCain would switch to the party he really belongs with, and run for Pres, I’d put him above all the others. Not that I think much of his domestic policy — but then I don’t think much of Bush’s either.

By: Mark Byron

Mark Byron — Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:16:40 +0000

May I become an echo and say Lieberman for all the reasons already mentioned.

Gephardt would be my second choice, but a distant second; he’s the least idiotarian of the rest of the pack and is the most positive as well.

The remainder of the pack I would trust as far as I could throw. Of the remainder, Kucinich is the only one I could see throwing down a cold beverage of choice with.

By: Jeffrey Utech

Jeffrey Utech — Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:16:21 +0000

I’d cast my ballot for Lieberman. Of course, given the fact that he’s the least liberal of the presidential candidates, that may have something to do with it. As Jon Stewart is fond of saying, “Joe Lieberman, the candidate for people who think President Bush isn’t Jewish enough.”

By: Christopher Johnson

Christopher Johnson — Thu, 24 Jul 2003 04:39:38 +0000

Joe Lieberman. Because he is a religious man and because he’s correct on the war against terrorism.