<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linker, Thinker, Soldier, Spy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinholtsberry.com/kh/2006/06/27/linker-thinker-soldier-spy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinholtsberry.com/kh/2006/06/27/linker-thinker-soldier-spy/</link>
	<description>for posterity and whatnot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:46:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowtown Pattie</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinholtsberry.com/kh/2006/06/27/linker-thinker-soldier-spy/comment-page-1/#comment-3219</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowtown Pattie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinholtsberry.com/kh/2006/06/27/linker-thinker-soldier-spy/#comment-3219</guid>
		<description>I truly understand.  I waffle between the &quot;thinker&quot; and the &quot;linker&quot; myself.  Run the gamut between serious and silly. i have read several blogs lately that are ruminating exactly the same quandary.

Does being an avid &quot;linker&quot; bring you readers, or keep you popular?  Maybe.  It is a little awkward and self-gratuitous at times.

Personally speaking, I CAN tell you that your reading suggestions have proved to be eduational nuggets for me.

Hope you find a happy resolution and compromise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I truly understand.  I waffle between the &#8220;thinker&#8221; and the &#8220;linker&#8221; myself.  Run the gamut between serious and silly. i have read several blogs lately that are ruminating exactly the same quandary.</p>
<p>Does being an avid &#8220;linker&#8221; bring you readers, or keep you popular?  Maybe.  It is a little awkward and self-gratuitous at times.</p>
<p>Personally speaking, I CAN tell you that your reading suggestions have proved to be eduational nuggets for me.</p>
<p>Hope you find a happy resolution and compromise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Holtsberry</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinholtsberry.com/kh/2006/06/27/linker-thinker-soldier-spy/comment-page-1/#comment-3218</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Holtsberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinholtsberry.com/kh/2006/06/27/linker-thinker-soldier-spy/#comment-3218</guid>
		<description>JG,

I have thought about disucssing books I haven&#039;t read and I do on occasion touch on reviews and debates when I haven&#039;t read the book in question.  But I haven&#039;t really developed a system for disscusing books I haven&#039;t read all the way through.  I really have a hard time not finishing books.  So if I start it, I want to finish it.  I seem to be an all or nothing type on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JG,</p>
<p>I have thought about disucssing books I haven&#8217;t read and I do on occasion touch on reviews and debates when I haven&#8217;t read the book in question.  But I haven&#8217;t really developed a system for disscusing books I haven&#8217;t read all the way through.  I really have a hard time not finishing books.  So if I start it, I want to finish it.  I seem to be an all or nothing type on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jg</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinholtsberry.com/kh/2006/06/27/linker-thinker-soldier-spy/comment-page-1/#comment-3217</link>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinholtsberry.com/kh/2006/06/27/linker-thinker-soldier-spy/#comment-3217</guid>
		<description>I think you have a good handle here.

BTW,  does one have to read the entire book?  Rigid scholarship may demand it.  Yet I once saw an interview with Bernard Lewis in his Princeton home library.  Asked about a certain title and whether he had read the volume, he replied something to the effect that he had read enough to know what it was about.
An interesting concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have a good handle here.</p>
<p>BTW,  does one have to read the entire book?  Rigid scholarship may demand it.  Yet I once saw an interview with Bernard Lewis in his Princeton home library.  Asked about a certain title and whether he had read the volume, he replied something to the effect that he had read enough to know what it was about.<br />
An interesting concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

